headerimg16.jpg

Main Menu

National Events

25 Mar - 27 Mar 2017
D H McKenzie - AFC1 - Brisbane
10 Jun - 12 Jun 2017
R Chaplin - AFC 2 - Adelaide
17 Jun - 18 Jun 2017
AFC Schools Teams - Brisbane
01 Jul - 04 Jul 2017
AFF National “Winter” Camp
05 Jul - 09 Jul 2017
AFC Cadet & Under 15's - Perth
12 Aug - 13 Aug 2017
AFC Schools Individuals - Brisbane
25 Aug - 28 Aug 2017
AFC3 - Sydney
21 Sep - 24 Sep 2017
AFC Junior Championships - Melbourne

Keep up to date

 

Like us and Follow us on the Official Australian Fencing Federation Facebook page.

 

Personal Sponsors

These organisations are directly Sponsoring a Fencer:

Sponsor-425-27.jpg
Sponsor-133-2.jpg

Thankyou for your support of the Sport of Fencing in Australia.

Elite sport is inherently about excellence. The right to represent Australia at the Olympic Games and the World Championships (open and age) represents the pinnacle of elite sport, and as such is a privilege to be earned. The Selection System sets out the minimum criteria which must be satisfied in order for a fencer to be eligible for selection for these events. Fencers are encouraged to view selection as merely the first step in the process of achieving the performance goals they have set themselves, rather than an end in itself.

Contact Details

The Selection Commission may be contacted through the Chair of the Selection Panel via the email address This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..  Sections 2.5 - 2.9 of the Selection Policy should be noted in this regard.

Process and Timing

The processes and timing of selections is documented both within the Selection Policy (for example, see section O4.10) and the relevant Operational Protocol (see here).  Note also the fact that the Selection Policy is complemented by some operational processes regarding entry to overseas events (see here).

Special Note Regarding Under-15s Rankings

The March 2015 Selection Policy introduced Under-15 Rankings.  However, a drafting flaw left open the issue of which events would constitute a point accumulation cycle, and how many events would constitute a ranking score.  As an interim measure, and consistent with the rest of the Policy, the Under-15s Rankings will follow the same process as the Cadet Rankings, as set out in C4.1 - C4.6, in addition to the inclusion of the National Under-15s Championships.  This drafting flaw will be addressed in a future version of this Policy.

Interpretation

Please be aware that AFF staff and directors cannot provide information relating to the intepretation of any section of the Selection Policy.  It should also be noted that the Selection Policy is the sole and exclusive source of ranking point allocation - there is no other way to gain ranking points except through the Policy. There is no body or person within any part of the AFF that has the power to allocate ranking points outside of the mechanisms within the Policy.

Special Selection Criteria - Multi-Weapon & Gender Teams

Special Selection Criteria were decided by the Board in December 2016 for the selection of athletes for the Team events involving multiple weapons and gender fencers, attached below.

Revised Selection Policy - March 2017

The AFF Board has approved the introduction of a revised AFF Selection Policy with effect from 12 March 2017.
 
The revised Policy makes a significant structural change to the existing Policy by consolidating the provisions which are common to all age groups in a single section so as to reduce duplication. Some of the key changes to the substantive provisions of the Policy include: 
  • 1) the amendment of the selection criteria for Asian Zone Championships to provide for equality as between AFT and AFS fencers;
  • 2) the introduction of provisions clarifying the process for individual and team selection for FIE, EFC and FCA events (where no call for nominations is undertaken);
  • 3) the expansion of provisions regardign team selection to provide for a greater range of team events (eg mixed ages, genders, weapons)
  • 4) the introduction of provisions regarding the replacement of selected fencers who subsequently withdraw from an event; and
  • 5) the correction of certain anomalies in Appendix A to allow for the allocation of points where none were previously available (eg where a lower age category fencer competing in a higher age category event was previously eligible to earn points in the higher age category but not in the lower age category).